The BBC have opened up debate on it getting managers and players views: http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/35551542
Not really much of a balanced survey they've done but I thought it interesting as we're meant to be changing to an artificial pitch for next season.
Just seems the predictable starting arguments against it, injuries, ball is different on it, can't do slide tackles unless it is wet or you get burns.
To address those one by one;
Isn't any evidence in that article of injuries on plastic compared to how many players are injured on grasss. Or players opinions who have played on it regular, why no Accies, Kilmarnock, Alloa, Falkirk, QoS, etc etc players being asked, there are 12 clubs in the SPFL playing on plastic, if any players pick up injuries due to playing on it surely they'd have more injuries than any other team.
Ball is different on it, yep, but then again the ball is different on grass pitches depending on the quality you're playing on, ours for instance is likely to cause an injury due to players slipping on it and twisting themselves, and if the ball hits a divot it'll bounce randomly, or skite on wet grass, for me that argument doesn't stand up, you just adapt to whatever pitch you're on.
The old burn story, from what I've read the old pitches were brutal but the newer ones are meant to be pretty good and I've seen players do slide tackles on them without looking like they've burned themselves, no sign of them attending a burn afterwards.
Hughes idea of a 50K bond, yeah lets impose more financial hardship on clubs, that just what football needs. Would make more sense to reward clubs that have grass than punish them for not keeping the grass in good nick. Why not give them 50K at the end of the season if they've kept their pitches to a certain standard all season, that would give clubs an incentive and compensate them for the cost of doing so.
On the whole the bbc article is outdated in opinion, not based on any real evidence and bog standard reaction from old school opinion. We need this properly researched.
Not really much of a balanced survey they've done but I thought it interesting as we're meant to be changing to an artificial pitch for next season.
Just seems the predictable starting arguments against it, injuries, ball is different on it, can't do slide tackles unless it is wet or you get burns.
To address those one by one;
Isn't any evidence in that article of injuries on plastic compared to how many players are injured on grasss. Or players opinions who have played on it regular, why no Accies, Kilmarnock, Alloa, Falkirk, QoS, etc etc players being asked, there are 12 clubs in the SPFL playing on plastic, if any players pick up injuries due to playing on it surely they'd have more injuries than any other team.
Ball is different on it, yep, but then again the ball is different on grass pitches depending on the quality you're playing on, ours for instance is likely to cause an injury due to players slipping on it and twisting themselves, and if the ball hits a divot it'll bounce randomly, or skite on wet grass, for me that argument doesn't stand up, you just adapt to whatever pitch you're on.
The old burn story, from what I've read the old pitches were brutal but the newer ones are meant to be pretty good and I've seen players do slide tackles on them without looking like they've burned themselves, no sign of them attending a burn afterwards.
Hughes idea of a 50K bond, yeah lets impose more financial hardship on clubs, that just what football needs. Would make more sense to reward clubs that have grass than punish them for not keeping the grass in good nick. Why not give them 50K at the end of the season if they've kept their pitches to a certain standard all season, that would give clubs an incentive and compensate them for the cost of doing so.
On the whole the bbc article is outdated in opinion, not based on any real evidence and bog standard reaction from old school opinion. We need this properly researched.